Price Suggestion
~45.5 keys
frostbite
Unusual Big Elfin Deal Frostbite
47 votes up
23 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed automatically because another price suggestion was accepted instead.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Counter suggestion


Sale 1: Sold with Strange Part: Damage Dealt (1.9 keys) and 15 keys pure for a Scorching Flames Bombing Run

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198174604321#!/compare/1490227200/1490832000

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198195731583#!/compare/1490140800/1490227200

Cannot be used because it's being used to update the Bombing Run

See here: http://backpack.tf/suggestion/591898a3e3387731b851fb62


Sale 2: Sold for It's a puzzle to me B'aaarrgh-n-Bicorne

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198317256915#!/compare/1490572800/1490659200

Is being used to update the Bicorne --> cannot be used

See here: http://backpack.tf/suggestion/5918b3180e2cad5d702d41d4


Sale 3: Sold for Cloud 9 Honcho (39; in-date) --> 39 Keys

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198317256915#!/compare/1490832000/1491004800


Sale 4: Bulk

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198119057660#!/compare/1493510400/1493596800


Sale 5: Cloud 9 Front Runner (40) + ~15 keys in sweets --> 55; capping at 50 keys.

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198069559160#!/compare/1494374400/1494460800

My B/O was 50.


Sale 6: Bulk

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198101092551#!/compare/1494288000/1494460800


Sale 7: Bulk

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198222561920#!/compare/1494806400/1494892800


--> Two useable sales at 39 keys & 50 keys.

Seller at 45 (new)

http://i.imgur.com/GEUNlyk.png


Suggesting range from 39-50

    sale 1 is not being used to update the bombing run (doesn't make either end of the range there)

    the other suggestion uses that sale in their suggestion which supports the lower end.

    another sold in bulk with a b/o of 42 and with the new seller at 45, i'd say 50 would be high here.

    think the other suggestion is a more accurate representation of it's price

      The bombing run affects the price because if this suggestion gets accepted over the other one then the bombing run would also be higher since it would then form the high-end of the bombing run.

      I think 37-39 is too low of a range.

        sales at 37, 39, 50

        50 is the clear outlier here, even more so when looking at previous and current sellers b/o's

          37 sale wouldn't exist if the Bombing Run would be updated with this Big Elfin Deal which it should. I think 44.5 keys as a median price represents the hat's value better than 38; including past sales and b/os. I'll wait for a mod to comment and if mods rules it is too high of a range I'll close it but I am convinced it works as a range because the range isn't even that big.

            bombing run suggestion is too high anyways due to b/o's at around 40~ thus again supporting a lower price on this

              I'm countering and using this sale for the bombing run.

      From the Bombing Run suggestion:

      "http://backpack.tf/item/966021470

      http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198195731583#!/compare/1490140800/1490227200

      http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198174604321#!/compare/1490227200/1490832000 - buyer's side

      Sold for a Frostbite Big Elfin Deal, a Strange Part: Damage Dealt (1.9 keys) and 15 keys pure - using there, would fit in range"


      What part of this makes you think this sale is being used with the Bombing Run and cannot be used on this hat?

        Because the Bombing Run would be priced higher if the other suggestion gets accepted

      Current owner hasn't sold it for 3 weeks now at 45 keys: [url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/29185430[/url] - not that well bumped though

      Also listed on classifieds here and relisted daily.

      I think this counters the 50 sale, though with Erik's active suggestion on the Bombing Run at 48 keys, that sale becomes 31 here. It seems kinda low, so I think 39 flat would work best here. I'll probably resuggest soon depending on feedback here and on Erik's suggestion.