Suggestion: Something Burning This Way Comes Hat of Cards at 200–250 keys

Price Suggestion

~475 keys

sbtwc

27 votes up

8 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed automatically because another price suggestion was accepted instead.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Bought it for 250 in mixed:

https://prnt.sc/tihwog

https://prnt.sc/tihx5b

https://prnt.sc/tihxbj

https://prnt.sc/tihxiq

Cauldron Bubbles Charmer's Chapeau(44) + Steaming Soldier's Stash(55) + Kill-a-Watt Reggaelator(12) + Specialized Killstreak Australium Knife (15,5) + specialized Killstreak Australium Rocket Launcher (35) + Dead Head (17) + Specialized Killstreak Australium Grenade Launcher (13) Specialized Killstreak Australium Stickybomb Launcher (12,5) + Halloween Footprint spell The Sub Zero Suit (6) + geniune app sap (5) + 30 keys pure + strange pink sticky launcher (10 euro or around 5 keys)

All in all:

44 + 55 + 12 + 15,5 + 35 + 17 + 13 + 12,5 + 6 + 5 + 30 + 5 = 250 keys

sale 2:

https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198120672630#!/compare/1591747200/1591833600

https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198168904938#!/compare/1591833600/1592006400

sold for 200 keys

A few general things regarding the suggestion:

- For hats with an outdated value (older than 3 months), you should present recent data points to back up their current value. In this suggestion, the charmers for example cannot be valued at 44. A recent sale at 39 is presented on a recent suggestion on it, so that should be taken instead.

- For items with spells on it, you will need to provide data to back up the value you use. You can't call the spelled sub at 6 without showing why. If the spelled variety has not sold recently, then it should be valued at its vanilla counterpart's value for the purpose of the suggestion.

Evaluating this and the other open suggestion at the same time:

The sales here are actually:

~160-170 ish (sale 1 from the other suggestion)

- 190

- 200

- ~240-245 (this sale, depending on whether or not 6 for the sub was based on an actual sale or not)

I believe 190-200 is a more appropriate representation here, given it preserves the mean. Especially seeing how the influx of buyers is recent, and seems to be the result of overcutting (they used to sit around 140, and the next highest one currently active sits at 120 because the rest disappeared). Im going to accept the other open suggestion here.